Monday, May 09, 2005

Behind the Iraq headlines

The headline reads "U.S. offensive near Syria kills 75." A good headline from CNN's point of view; the US killed 75 people, possibly even innocents as far as they've told you so far. It's the type of talking point the left loves to spout... "just yesterday our troops killed 75 Iraqis, never would have happened under Clinton..." But read the rest of the article:

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- U.S. forces have launched an offensive against "insurgents and foreign fighters" near Iraq's border with Syria, killing at least 75 of them in the first 24 hours of the operation, the U.S. military said Monday.


Well at least they clear up who got killed, but I like how they bury some of the good news in the article at the very end:

Another al-Zarqawi associate -- captured April 26 -- helped U.S. and Iraqi forces kill six insurgents Sunday and capture another 54 in western Iraq near the Syrian border, the U.S. military said.

The anti-insurgent operation took place near the Rawa region in the Anbar province north of Qaim, the military said. The region is a base for rebel attacks in Baghdad and Falluja.

Information provided by al-Zarqawi associate Ghassan Muhammad Amin Husayn al-Rawi helped the operation, according to the military.

During the mission, U.S. and Iraqi "forces also destroyed car bombs, bomb-making material and two buildings that contained large weapons caches," the military said.

Before his capture, al-Rawi "facilitated movement and meetings for al-Zarqawi in the Rawa region, facilitated movement of foreign fighters, and was responsible for terrorist activity resulting in the murder of innocent Iraqis," according to Saturday's announcement of his capture by the military.

Word of the raid came a day after U.S. soldiers captured 33 suspected terrorists, including two men described as "high value targets" in the Baghdad area, the U.S. military said.


I would think a headline like "US intelligence from captured rebel leads to weapons cache" sounds pretty good, and might sell more papers than the negativity at CNN or the LA Times.